HomeMy WebLinkAboutMCCJAEXL.DOCMccjaexl.doc
5/22/01
Rosa Mcclough (326-4616) called about dividing this tract to establish a lot for each of the two dwellings that is presently located here. She said that this was done as a hardship.
I set up an appointment with her to review this information on May 23, 2001.
5/23/01
Met with RM and told her that I would need to further research this matter so that I could find out how the r/w came into being. I did find a hardship file on this. I told her that
I would review with Donna and get back with her with her options.
5/30/01
Spoke to Donna about this and she said that with the acreage being this close, if divided it would be 19,602 sq. ft. per lot, I needed to research the r/w good. I researched the r/w
and it is shown on a 1974 deed with the lot being clear of the r/w. Donna said that she thought that we should honor this division (and I concurred) because it was allowed to be permitted
as a hardship with this amount of acreage. The old deed calls for one acre even, but the tax records show it as 0.9 acres.
I called and left a message for RM to call me back regarding this information.
6/4/01
I spoke to RM and told her that we would honor this division and that it would be exempt from subdivision guidelines because it is less than two acres in size. I told her that she
would need to get with a surveyor to establish the two tracts and that she would have to make sure that the existing structures meet our minimum setback requirements. I told her that
this would not have to be platted and recorded since it would be considered exempt.
6/22/01
RH: Spoke with Ted at Miller surveying. I told him since deed called for 1.0 acres and access is private (hence, access is private property not dedicated), it can be used as acerage
calculation. They need 20,000 sq ft (and can include easement) for each lot. This is exempt from subd review (no mylar).
7/3/01
RH: Tom Rowe was in. I gave him above info.